The Court of Appeals recently dealt with the issue of an injury to an employee while on an employer mandated lunch break in the case of Mintz v. Verizon Wireless, COA12-306, 2012 WL 5846239 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 20, 2012). The Court agreed with the Industrial Commission and found that there is a causal relationship between plaintiff’s employment and her injury because she incurred her injury based on a condition in her workplace. “Plaintiff was injured in a common area of the building, and the record indicates that employees were not only authorized but also encouraged to go to the first floor since Eurst, the cafeteria for employees, was located there, and employees had authorization to walk through the hallways on the first floor. Thus, we affirm the Full Commission’s conclusion that plaintiff’s injury “arose out of” her employment.” Mintz v. Verizon Wireless, COA12-306, 2012 WL 5846239 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 20, 2012). Defendants argued: (1) plaintiff’s injury did not occur at a time reasonably related to her employment since she was on an unpaid lunch break; (2) defendant-employer did not control or own the building where defendant was injured; and (3) plaintiff was not engaged in activities related to her employment. The Court of Appeals disagreed for the reasons below. “With regard to determining whether an injury occurs “in the course of” employment, this Court has concluded that The words [i]n the course of have reference to the time, place and circumstances under which the accident occurred. Clearly, a conclusion that the injury occurred in the course of employment is required where there is evidence that it occurred during the hours of employment and at the place of employment while the claimant was actually in the performance of the duties of the employment. Harless, 1 N.C.App. at 455-56, 162 S.E.2d at 52. With regard to the time element, “the course of employment begins a reasonable time before actual work begins and continues for a reasonable time after work ends and includes intervals during the work day for rest and refreshment.” Id. at 456, 162 S.E.2d at 53 (emphasis added). Defendants allege that this element is not met because plaintiff was on an unpaid lunch break. The Full Commission determined that plaintiff’s injury occurred during a time in her work day “built in for the employees’ rest and refreshment.” Moreover, the Full Commission noted that defendant-employer requires its employees to take an hour-long lunch break. While defendants focus on the fact that plaintiff was injured during an unpaid break to support their argument that the injury did not occur at a time reasonably related to her employment, we have no support in our caselaw for the proposition that the element of time is not established if an employee is on an unpaid break. Here, plaintiff’s injury occurred during the hours of employment, even though it happened during an unpaid break. Thus, the Full Commission’s conclusion accurately reflects that “in the course of” includes times during the workday for rest and refreshment. See Harless, 1 N.C.App. at 456, 162 S.E.2d at 53. Therefore, we affirm the Full Commission’s conclusion of law with regard to the element of time. With regard to the element of place, defendants contend that the Full Commission’s conclusion of law no. 5 was erroneous. Moreover, defendants allege that findings of fact nos. 4-8, to the extent they infer defendant-employer maintained or controlled the building, were not supported by competent evidence. Place is considered the “premises of the employer.” Harless, 1 N.C.App. at 456, 162 S.E.2d at 52. While the Full Commission noted in its findings that defendant-employer no longer owned the building where plaintiff worked, it indicated that “[d]efendant[e] mployer continued to be the main tenant in the building and maintained and controlled all activities occurring in the building.” These findings were supported by competent evidence in the record that established all other contractors in the building, including the cleaning contractors, mail room, security, and Eurst, provided services to defendant-employer. Moreover, the only other business, Strayer University, offered services exclusively to employees of defendant-employer. Based on these findings, the Full Commission concluded that because “an accident may be compensable if it occurs on the premises of the employer or adjacent premises that are owned or controlled by the employer[,]” the element of place was met because defendant-employer “still essentially controlled the building, including the common area in which [p]laintiff fell.” In support of its conclusion, the Full Commission cited Strickland v. King, 293 N.C. 731, 239 S.E.2d 243 (1977), and Bass v. Mecklenburg County, 258 N.C. 226, 128 S.E.2d 570 (1962). In Bass, our Supreme Court noted that “injuries sustained by an employee while going to or from his place of work upon premises owned or controlled by his employer are generally deemed to have arisen out of and in the course of the employment … provided the employee’s act involves no unreasonable delay.” 258 N.C. at 232, 128 S.E.2d at 574. Here, there was competent evidence that plaintiff was injured on premises essentially controlled by defendant-employer while she was returning to her cubicle from the first floor of the building during her lunch break. Thus, the conclusion that the element of place was met is justified, and defendants’ argument is without merit. See, Mintz v. Verizon Wireless, COA12-306, 2012 WL 5846239 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 20, 2012). Thus the Court of Appeals confirmed that Plaintiff was within the Course AND Scope of her employment at the time of her injury. Visit our website for more information on North Carolina workers’ compensation.
Focused On Serving Your Needs

"UPDATE: To protect your safety during the coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis, we offer video conferencing, as well as telephone conferences, in place of face-to-face meetings. Please contact our office today to set up a remote consultation."
Injury while on lunch break; is it workers’ compensation in North Carolina?
Categories
- Actos (3)
- Auto Accident Law (40)
- Blog (37)
- Business Or Tourist Affected By Power Outage (1)
- Car Accidents (105)
- Car Crash? What To Do Next (1)
- Choosing Your North Carolina Injury Or Disability Attorney (1)
- Civil Trial (64)
- Damages (1)
- David Bridgman Joins O'Malley Tunstall (1)
- DraftKings Or FanDuel Fantasy Sports (1)
- Drug Maker Failed To Warn Cancer Patients Of Permanent Hair Loss (1)
- E-cigarette Exploding Causing Burns (1)
- Federal Social Security Disability Cases (1)
- Firm News (6)
- Haeco Leaked Confidential Employee Information (1)
- Halloween Safety For Your Children (1)
- Halloween Safety For Your Children (1)
- Infection Following Hip Or Knee Replacement Surgery (1)
- Injured By A Drunk Driver (3)
- Insurance Company (1)
- Joe Tunstall And Susan O’Malley Selected 2019 NC Super Lawyers (1)
- Legally Speaking (119)
- Long-term Disability (5)
- Low Testosterone (1)
- Motor Vehicle Accidents (16)
- Move Over! Bill Requires Slow Drivers To Move Over From Left Lane (1)
- Nash County Beta Club Going To National Convention (1)
- NC Lawyers Reviewing Byetta, Januvia, Victoza (1)
- NC Lawyers Reviewing Byetta, Januvia, Victoza (1)
- NC Medical Malpractice Verdict Tunstall (1)
- NONE (1)
- North Carolina Farmers With Syngenta Corn Claims (1)
- North Carolina Injury Attorney (1)
- O'Malley Tunstall has two named to Super Lawyers 2021 NC (1)
- O'Malley Tunstall Referrals: The Best Advertising (1)
- Pedestrian Accident (1)
- Personal Injuries (4)
- Personal Injury (3)
- Personal Injury Law (65)
- Premises Liability (20)
- Products Liability (42)
- Protect Yourself, Keep Vehicle Under Control During MVA (1)
- Second Wreck – Use The Same Attorney? (1)
- Serious Heart Or Kidney Problems On Invokana Or Canagliflozin (1)
- Serious Injury? Need NC Social Security, Workers' Compensation And Auto Accident Lawyer? (1)
- Settlement Child Hurt Bounce House Inflatable (1)
- Sexual Enhancement (1)
- Slip Trip Fall (1)
- Social Security (11)
- Social Security (8)
- Social Security Disability (24)
- Social Security Disability Backlog 2017 (1)
- Social Security Disability Benefits (1)
- Social Security Disability If You Cannot Use Both Hands (1)
- Social Security Disability Limited Time To Apply For Benefits (1)
- Social Security Law (55)
- Social Security Wait Times (2)
- SSDI (1)
- Susan O'Malley's Social Security Decision Ten Year Anniversary (1)
- Susan O'Malley's Social Security Decision Ten Year Anniversary (1)
- Trips Slips And Falls At Stores (1)
- Truck Accidents (3)
- Truck Accidents (63)
- Tunstall Named Super Lawyer 2015 Personal Injury (1)
- Tunstall Named Super Lawyer 2017 Personal Injury (1)
- Tunstall Selected To 2015 List Nation's Top One Percent (1)
- Tunstall Selected To The 2017 List As Nation's Top One Percent (1)
- Wags 4 Tags (1)
- Wear Helmet While Riding Horses (1)
- Winter Driving Safety (1)
- Workers' Compensation (63)
- Workers' Compensation Law (17)
- Xarelto (1)
Archives
- March 2021 (2)
- February 2021 (2)
- January 2021 (2)
- November 2020 (1)
- October 2020 (2)
- September 2020 (5)
- August 2020 (6)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (7)
- May 2020 (6)
- April 2020 (5)
- March 2020 (8)
- February 2020 (6)
- January 2020 (6)
- December 2019 (7)
- November 2019 (5)
- October 2019 (5)
- September 2019 (7)
- August 2019 (7)
- July 2019 (6)
- June 2019 (5)
- May 2019 (6)
- April 2019 (10)
- March 2019 (3)
- February 2019 (6)
- January 2019 (7)
- December 2018 (5)
- November 2018 (5)
- October 2018 (6)
- September 2018 (3)
- August 2018 (9)
- July 2018 (9)
- June 2018 (9)
- May 2018 (8)
- April 2018 (9)
- March 2018 (9)
- February 2018 (9)
- January 2018 (11)
- December 2017 (9)
- November 2017 (9)
- October 2017 (11)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (11)
- July 2017 (9)
- June 2017 (8)
- May 2017 (12)
- April 2017 (10)
- March 2017 (11)
- February 2017 (9)
- January 2017 (10)
- December 2016 (10)
- November 2016 (5)
- October 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (2)
- July 2016 (3)
- June 2016 (2)
- May 2016 (8)
- April 2016 (2)
- March 2016 (2)
- February 2016 (2)
- January 2016 (3)
- December 2015 (2)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (3)
- September 2015 (3)
- August 2015 (2)
- July 2015 (4)
- June 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (3)
- March 2015 (4)
- February 2015 (4)
- January 2015 (8)
- December 2014 (3)
- November 2014 (2)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (4)
- August 2014 (3)
- July 2014 (3)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (3)
- April 2014 (6)
- March 2014 (6)
- February 2014 (4)
- January 2014 (4)
- December 2013 (4)
- November 2013 (5)
- October 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (2)
- August 2013 (4)
- July 2013 (5)
- June 2013 (3)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (2)
- March 2013 (4)
- February 2013 (3)
- January 2013 (2)
- December 2012 (7)
- November 2012 (3)
- October 2012 (5)
- September 2012 (2)
- August 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (2)
- June 2012 (3)
- April 2012 (5)
- March 2012 (4)
- February 2012 (6)
- January 2012 (8)
- December 2011 (4)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (2)
- September 2011 (8)
- August 2011 (9)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (8)
- April 2011 (4)


